A BRIEF HISTORY OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IN THE LAKE ALMANOR BASIN

Lake Almanor, on a recent early-winter day.

Lake Almanor, on a recent early-winter day.

One crucial step in analyzing historic trends in fish distribution in the Upper Feather River Basin has been gaining access to the data collected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) over the past 100+ years. In order to access some of this data, I recently visited the CDFW Region II headquarters near Nimbus Dam and the American River fish hatchery, where I was able to begin digging through the vast records stored there.

While I have been steadily working on collecting and organizing any and all data and literature related to fisheries in the Upper Feather River Basin for the past few weeks, I have come across not only valuable information for analyzing the distribution of species present in the watershed, but also some interesting narratives and revealing histories. These narratives often concern changes in resource management philosophy, struggles to balance economic concerns and ecological conditions, and sometimes show evidence of shifting biological baselines. One interesting example of resource management history concerns that of the fisheries of the Lake Almanor Basin.

Early Records

The dam that formed Lake Almanor was completed in 1912 (and subsequently raised in 1927), damming the North Fork of the Feather River and flooding the broad, flat Big Meadows basin, thus creating a generally shallow lake considering its vast surface area. While the fishery was considered to be in good condition through the first few decades after the lake’s formation (an explosion in productivity is typical of newly formed reservoirs), by the early 1940s it was held to be in decline. CDFW (then the Division of Fish and Game) consequently commissioned one of its Biological Surveyors, J.H. Wales, to draft a general report on the conditions of the lake. Wales identified numerous cold-water, warm-water, as well as rough fish in this initial assessment of biodiversity (Table 1, below).

Table 1- A history of species presence based the records of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Table 1- A history of species presence based the records of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Wales’ recommendations for improving the fishery consisted primarily of ramping up stocking programs. Wales was interested in testing the results of stocking various life-stages of Rainbow trout, Coho salmon, and Chinook salmon, but also exploring the effect of screening hydroelectric infrastructure and rescuing fingerlings from tributaries to improve productivity.

In 1950, a very similar assemblage of fish species in Lake Almanor was described by Robert Harry, a student biologist at CDFW, with the exceptions that the black bass species present was identified as largemouth, bluegill were listed as the only sunfish, suckers were noted as Western suckers, and Baird sculpin were added to the observation. The reason for the differences in species listed can only be speculated upon, but may have included inaccuracy of anecdotal reporting by anglers and lodge owners or by subjectivity of the surveyor.

While management of Lake Almanor had primarily focused on promoting a cold-water fishery, by the early 1960s the CDFW began considering managing the system as a warm-water fishery as well. The limnological characteristics (physical conditions) of the lake had already allowed for the establishment of numerous warm-water species, as mentioned above. In his 1962 report, C.E Geibel recommended the introduction of warm-water species such as smallmouth bass (only largemouth bass had been confirmed at this point), as well as white catfish or channel catfish. Geibel believed that warm-water fishery management would have no impact on the cold-water fishery, as the two sets of species had little overlapping distribution within the lake, and that the added perspective would improve the Lake Almanor fishery overall. Geibel even posited that warm-water species management could help to improve the cold-water fishery by allowing greater control of “rough fish,” a group of fish primarily comprised of carp, squawfish, suckers, and chub, but essentially meaning non-gamefish. While the establishment of a smallmouth fishery would in later years become a substantial success, the control of rough fish would be a management concern for a number of years to come.

Commercial fisheries and the control of rough fish…

Carp and the other rough fish are believed to have occupied the lake from the time of, or shortly after, the completion of dam construction. As the populations of these species grew, managers became concerned about the potential impacts the spectacular abundance of these species could have on the cold-water fishery. Potential negative impacts could be sorted broadly into two categories: direct, as in the form of predation on the eggs or fry of cold-water species, and indirect, as in the form of competition for forage species, among other theories. Managers were unsure about the potential degree that impacts could have on fishery production, hypothesizing effects as being anywhere from negligible to disastrous.

Interestingly, efforts to control rough fish populations were implemented early in the history of Lake Almanor. The Department of Fish and Wildlife was not only concerned about control, but efficacy of control efforts, as exemplified by the resources spent to evaluate effective means of control during the late 1960s and 1970s. These studies informed their work, which likely started with chemical treatments to control carp populations, but expanded to include trapping spawning runs in tributaries and commercial fishery permitting. For a time, a commercial carp fishery existed in the Basin that supplied fishmeal for poultry feed and fresh catch to Los Angeles markets. However, these operations were eventually shut down due to lack of sustainability of the operations. Other commercial fisheries of lesser scale and importance also existed at various times on the lake. One such fishery was for crayfish, but as the species is known to be an important forage item for sportfish, the Plumas County Board of Supervisors implemented a resolution that prohibited the commercial harvest of crayfish throughout the county. Ever since, commercial activity associated with Lake Almanor fisheries has been limited to those benefits provided by the recreational fisheries alone.

The role of forage fish and the problem of disease

While the issue of competition with rough fish was long held to be a factor depressing the quality of the coldwater fishery in Lake Almanor, it was later understood to only be one of many. Part of the reason for the prolific rainbow trout fishery seen in the early decades after the formation of the lake was an abundant population of the native Red-sided minnow, a symptom of the overall explosion in productivity in the Lake. This fish species bolstered the quality of the fishery by acting as an abundant source of high-protein forage for the rainbow trout that inhabited Lake Almanor, allowing even average individuals to grow to impressive sizes (Wales mentions in his report an exceptional fish weighing approximately 18lbs.!).

Pond smelt, which were introduced by the CDFW in the 1980s, have become one of, if not the principal forage fish in Lake Almanor.

Pond smelt, which were introduced by the CDFW in the 1980s, have become one of, if not the principal forage fish in Lake Almanor.

Coinciding with the overall decline of post-construction productivity, the population of red-sided minnows eventually collapsed. Numerous reasons were cited for the decline, including predation by or competition with rough fishes, but the most probable being some sort of bacterial epidemic. With this collapse of a critical forage source for rainbow trout, the sport fishery entered true decline. As a result, CDFW began to evaluate different forage species for introduction in order to fill the ecological niche of the minnow, to once again support a productive cold-water fishery. Forage species considered included Mysis shrimp in the late 1960s, Threadfin shad in the early 1970s, and, finally, Pond smelt in the 1980s. The introduction of Pond smelt proved to be the most successful, and this species remains the primary forage source for cold-water fish in the Basin. In fact, the movement and behavior of Pond smelt heavily guides that of the target sport fish species today.

In addition to population crashes of forage species, the Lake Almanor fishery has historically been impacted by varying degrees and types of disease. As mentioned above, a bacterial epidemic was identified as a likely culprit in the collapse of the red-sided minnow population, and furthermore had delayed, altered, or halted numerous stocking efforts in the past. Some diseases commonly affect the cold-water fishery today, especially in the summer months when the lake warms and cold-water species congregate in areas with the coolest temperatures, thus allowing the spread of pathogens. The presence of disease and parasites remain a management concern today and will continue to be in the future.

Then and Now

Like many reservoirs, fisheries management in Lake Almanor has been and will continue to be is a dynamic and evolving process. While efforts and experiments by or acknowledged by the CDFW in the past have included stocking rainbow trout, brown trout, brook trout, Coho salmon, Chinook salmon, Chum salmon, Sockeye salmon, and smallmouth bass, the strongest fisheries that have persisted have been those for rainbow trout, brown trout, chinook salmon and smallmouth bass. This persistence has been made possible either by continued stocking, natural reproduction, or both, and with impressive specimens of each harvested by the public every year. Because of this, stocking will likely continue to be a major source for species diversity and abundance in Lake Almanor.

The direct population control of rough fish has waned as a priority for managers (although a popular bow-fishing event hosted by local anglers that focuses on the harvest of carp occurs each summer) in favor of pursuing management of both cold- and warm-water fisheries. This shift in priority has been guided by better understanding of ecological conditions and dynamics of Lake, including how the management of the Lake affects, and is affected by, other resource areas upstream and downstream. Recent events, namely the draining of Mountain Meadows Reservoir upstream of Lake Almanor and consequent potential introduction or reintroduction of new species, underscores the implications of upstream effects and will have unforeseen effects on the future management of the fishery. Additionally, persistent drought, as well as the spectrum of climate change will likely affect the quality and composition of the fishery in years to come.

A happy angler displays a brown trout she caught on a recent outing!

A happy angler displays a brown trout she caught on a recent outing!

Fisheries management of Lake Almanor has always been a community concern in Plumas County with Assembly members, county supervisors, area lodge owners, campground operators, and individual citizens all in regular correspondence with CDFW regarding the resources that they rely upon and enjoy. Now more than ever, though, is the community interested and involved in the management of the reservoirs fishery, with community groups self-charged with water quality monitoring in the Basin, and angling associations steering hatchery efforts as well as habitat restorations. The local high school even has a program involving students in the running of a fish hatchery that supplies fish to the Lake.

In the future, successful management of the reservoir’s fishery and those upstream and down, in a way that satisfies the wants and needs of local communities and their visitors, will necessarily continue to be an integrative and inclusive process, requiring continued community engagement and support. Numerous opportunities exist to get involved in improving the quality of the fishery in Lake Almanor or the factors that affect it. The Almanor Fishing Association is a nonprofit organization made up of fishermen and local citizens interested in maintaining the health and quality of the Lake Almanor fishery. Feather River Trout Unlimited devotes it’s time to community outreach, education related efforts and resource conservation projects that positively affect the citizens and resources of the Feather, Yuba, and Little Truckee Rivers. The Lake Almanor Watershed Group (LAWG, formerly the Almanor Basin Watershed Advisory Committee) is a group of eleven community volunteers that exists for the purpose of addressing water quality, land use, and critical habitat issues in the Almanor Basin. Each offers its own unique opportunities, from water quality monitoring, to hands-on conservation work, to working with the next generation of anglers and scientists.

Thank you to Amber Rossi, CDFW District Fishery Biologist for Plumas and Sierra Counties, and Kevin Thomas, CDFW Senior Environmental Scientist Region II, for facilitating access to the records that have informed this post. This work has been sponsored by Sierra Nevada Brewery and the New Belgium Foundation Water Conservation and Restoration Grant.


APPROACHES TO DATA ORGANIZATION AND MAPPING FOR HISTORIC FISH DISTRIBUTIONS…

Much welcomed fresh snow in the morning!

Much welcomed fresh snow in the morning!

As a Sierra Fellow, my role is to assist with the development of a basin-scale assessment and restoration framework for the fisheries of the Upper Feather River (above Lake Oroville). Read my first blog post here!

Thankfully, snow and rain have continued to fall fairly consistently here in the Almanor Basin and across the state (a snow covered lawn makes a fantastic place for practicing fly-casting!). With these changes in season, the first phase of the Upper Feather River Basin-wide Native Fisheries Assessment and Improvement Strategy has entered full swing, and with it a number of interesting challenges and questions have arisen.

Of these challenges, first and foremost, we must tackle the challenge of database organization. The historic fishery distribution data collected for the first phase of this project will be great in volume and disparate in depth. Consequently, it is an important task to develop protocols and methods for data organization in order to facilitate subsequent workflows. The primary questions have been:

  • What are the best database management systems and tools for use in this type of project?
  • What are the capabilities needed from these systems and sets of tools to accomplish our goals?
  • What is going to be the best way to share information produced for use by the scientific community and the general public?

Another important concern is that the systems and tools used must be flexible enough to efficiently capture information from a variety of sources. The range of these anticipated sources include peer-reviewed literature, natural resource survey data from multiple agencies and private companies, as well as anecdotal information from interviews with local anglers. All of these questions have indicated a real need for thoughtful organization up front.

Another challenge has been ascertaining the location of historic fishery data for Upper Feather River watershed. The primary questions involved have been:

  • What data is available?
  • Where precisely is the information located? and
  • In what format is the data recorded (hopefully, digitized in some manner!)?
Getting acquainted with the watershed and some of the available fishery data!

Getting acquainted with the watershed and some of the available fishery data!

Fishery data encountered so far has come in a number of forms. While the best data, or that which we have the most confidence in with respect to accuracy, comes in the form of fishery-specific surveys utilizing electrofishing or snorkel counts as a method, other forms include stream-side surveys, and even habitat surveys. (Habitat surveys can, based on quality of habitat in a given stream reach, infer the presence of fish in a given area.)

Because data on the Upper Feather has been collected by so many different entities over the years, relevant data varies in collection method, sampling protocol, and format, and is stored in locations across the state. Some of the needed data range in location from ranger district offices in the eastern portions of Plumas National Forest to California Department of Fish and Wildlife archives in their Sacramento area headquarters. Additionally, important information may be found in data that exists in the form of scribbled lines in a field notebook circa the 1950s, or a fully assembled online database and mapping tool. The discrepancies in depth, location, and accessibility of these available data create the base for my first major hurdle in advancing the data-collection phase of the Basin-wide Assessment.

An additional source of valuable historic information on the quality of the fishery in the past can be found in the expertise of long-time anglers familiar with certain areas of the Basin. In order to acquire this information I will be capturing interviews with these individuals via recordings or videos, and use these accounts to assist in my understanding of historic distributions of different fish species. I mean to collect accounts from as many of these individuals as possible in order to examine the validity of information gathered via interview by looking for correlation with natural resource survey data collected in the same areas that they describe. If a correlation between survey-based distribution data and interview-based data is apparent it will be included in distribution analyses, utilizing the experience of these anglers as a wealth of informal sampling knowledge.

Once all of these varying forms of data are organized and collated, there arises the task of representing this information geographically in order to determine where fish were located in the past and how that has changed over time. This information will provide some indication as to where habitat stressors affecting the fishery may be present or where conditions have remained stable, highlighting areas that may be most important to examine in a later assessment focused on habitat conditions. Habitat stressors can occur at various scales. They can be a landscape-wide phenomenon, such as excessive sediment loading from an eroding road system, or they can occur at the level of the stream itself, such as where an agricultural water diversion takes place. Consequently, I plan to represent species distributions in the Upper Feather River both at the watershed and stream level.

Rainbow trout presence (in red) in a portion of the Upper Feather River Basin, displayed at the watershed scale, USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC). Data obtained courtesy of USFS.

Rainbow trout presence (in red) in a portion of the Upper Feather River Basin, displayed at the watershed scale, USGS 14-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC). Data obtained courtesy of USFS.

To display distribution by watershed, one potential method will involve symbolizing each watershed unit for species presence, absence, or richness (i.e. number of species). This representation can provide information on species abundance, both qualitatively (with categories like few, common, or abundant) and quantitatively (using specific species count numbers) depending on data availability and quality. An example of this representation appears above, which shows rainbow trout presence (in red) by watershed in and around the Lake Almanor basin. A map like this really elucidates the range of a given species, which is certainly an important piece of information, but perhaps not enough to make truly informed management decisions. It’s also necessary for resource managers to know what is affecting fish populations very near to and right within the place they live: the water!!!

Chinook salmon distribution, displayed at the stream reach scale, for four neighboring foothill streams. Data obtained courtesy of CDFW.

Chinook salmon distribution, displayed at the stream reach scale, for four neighboring foothill streams. Data obtained courtesy of CDFW.

Another method is to display distribution by stream reach, which shows the extent of a species’ distribution on an actual mapped stream or river feature. Representing distribution in this way can yield significantly more useable information for management as it occurs on a finer scale than that of watershed-based representation. For instance, one species may use a certain tributary in a watershed while its non-native competitor uses that and two others, thus indicating that restoration should be focused where it might be of the most benefit to native species. An example of this representation looks like the figure above, which displays the extent of Chinook salmon distribution in four neighboring foothill stream systems. The data used for this example was retrieved from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic and Observation System (BIOS). Another powerful example is StreamNet, a regional forum for fish and aquatic habitat information management and data sharing in the Columbia River Basin that includes extensive reach level distribution data.

I anticipate constructing datasets using both methods for the Upper Feather River Basin-wide Assessment and looking at each at various appropriate timescales and incorporating varying levels of data confidence. The assessment will include information on probable distribution in the geologic and prehistoric past. One way this information can be generated is through modeling historic habitat conditions and inferring distribution from the results but for this assessment this information will likely come primarily from literature review.

However, synthesizing information from the available survey record of the last century, in the manner described above, will help managers to better understand trends that have been occurring over more recent decades and to make informed decisions therefrom. I hope to develop maps of displaying more- and less-conservative estimates of distribution by incorporating greater and fewer data sources, ranging from layers based solely on the conventional fish population sampling methods of electrofishing and snorkel surveys to layers incorporating all available data sources.

I will be excited to share the results of these analyses and some powerful stories about the quality of fishery in the past that will hopefully inspire progress towards recovery for the future. Please comment with any thoughts, suggestions or pointers.


EXCITING BEGINNINGS (AND A FEW COLD MORNINGS) HERE IN CHESTER, CALIFORNIA!

A small brown trout caught from Last Chance Creek just upstream of Chester meadow. Once heavily stocked by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, these fish compete with native rainbow trout populations. However, well-established wild populations also…

A small brown trout caught from Last Chance Creek just upstream of Chester meadow. Once heavily stocked by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, these fish compete with native rainbow trout populations. However, well-established wild populations also create valuable recreation opportunities and tourist attractions, and thus serve as a benefit for local rural communities.

So… first, a little about myself, then a little about my project, my first month on board, and my efforts to begin creating a positive impact in the community surrounding my new home.

Born and raised Northern California, I grew up moving between the small foothill and farm towns of the North State, exploring the outdoors when and wherever possible, and doing so primarily through angling. I attended the University of California, Berkeley, where I completed a BA in Geography and learned about the real value of working for positive impact on society and environment.

Plug and pond meadow restoration treatment in the Red Clover Valley in eastern Plumas National Forest.

Plug and pond meadow restoration treatment in the Red Clover Valley in eastern Plumas National Forest.

Since then I’ve worked on Northern California land conservation as a Land Steward with the Sutter Buttes Regional Land Trust, where I was tasked with strategizingconservation efforts and monitoring the land trust’s conservation easements and real-property holdings.

More recently, as a member in the AmeriCorps Watershed Stewards Program, I worked at the intersection of fisheries science, watershed-focused education, and community service. Working with the staff of the Marin Municipal Water District Fishery Program, I monitored the salmon and trout populations on Lagunitas Creek in West Marin, educated area classrooms, and coordinated volunteer habitat restoration events and citizen science initiatives amid other community outreach. I am excited to apply and expand upon the skills learned through these experiences over the coming year and consider it a pleasure and privilege to do so in service as a Sierra Fellow.

Aftermath of the Moonlights Fire. Today’s devastating wildfires, the product of decades of misinformed management centered on fire suppression, not only affect forest health but also in-stream habitat conditions by creating unstable slope conditions…

Aftermath of the Moonlights Fire. Today’s devastating wildfires, the product of decades of misinformed management centered on fire suppression, not only affect forest health but also in-stream habitat conditions by creating unstable slope conditions and releasing massive amounts of sediment. This can negatively affect trout and other aquatic organisms.

My project as a Sierra Fellow will consist of completing a Basin-wide Native Fish Assessment and Improvement Strategy for the Upper Feather River Watershed. The complete project area is comprised of the the four primary branches of the Feather River and all of their tributaries above Lake Oroville.

This work will consist of assessing historic distributions of fish species within the watershed, investigating watershed and habitat conditions that affect fishery quality, and identifying current distributions of fish species using an exciting new sampling technique that reveals presence and absence of species by examining eDNA (environmental DNA, extracted from small bits of tissue suspended in the water column). I will then collate all of this information into a cohesive and comprehensive basin-wide restoration strategy for the watershed.

An excavated pool on Upper Indian Creek, above Antelope Lake, created to aid the passage of spawning wild trout that migrate up from the lake; many road crossings and other culverts across the watershed are still in need of retrofit to allow such pa…

An excavated pool on Upper Indian Creek, above Antelope Lake, created to aid the passage of spawning wild trout that migrate up from the lake; many road crossings and other culverts across the watershed are still in need of retrofit to allow such passage.

My first month as a Sierra Fellow has been an exciting learning experience, consisting of getting to know the Plumas National Forest by touring watersheds, seeing the sorts of watershed degradation that has occurred in the past, visiting restored sites, strategizing project efforts with technical support partners, and in my free time exploring the streams and rivers near my new home in Chester.

In addition to my work on the larger scientific initiative, as Sierra Fellows, it is important for us to integrate into the communities we now call home and create some positive impact therein. For my part, I am planning to engage with the community by promoting literacy through Plumas County Library’s literacy program. I will serve as a volunteer tutor to help strengthen the literacy skills of children and adults alike.